Peer-Review+Sheet

Group 1: Fahad, Don, Tony Group 2: Amy, Laura, Jackie Group 3: Pat, Staci, Bailey Group 4: Dominique, Daniel, John Group 5: Mariah, Jodi, John Group 6: Esaam, Ann, Matthew

//Peer-Review Directions // Write an **endnote** on each draft you read which addresses some of the following that you find relevant: 1) how well does the paper counterargue the overall claim, 2) how well is the website described and discussed in terms of intended audience, purpose, and genre, 3) how focused and specific is the thesis, 4) how well does the paper integrate useful visuals, 5) how well do the paragraphs transition between one another at the beginning and at the end of the paragraphs, 6) is the Work Cited page and visuals cited in MLA format, 7) are the paragraphs specific enough when evaluating the website, and 8) is there a relevant conclusion that connects the paper to larger issues concerning the rhetoric of websites or why it’s relevant for the website’s authors to take your critique seriously?